This replica Patek Philippe Aquanaut watch has been in the market for years, in the past, the best one is made by 3K Factory, but this factory seems to be extremely lazy because they almost have done no upgrades on this replica watch, I think this is because no one else can use the super clone 324 movement, 3K has totally controled it in the past several years, so people have no choices, if they wanted to buy the best replica of this Patek Philippe Aquanaut watch with a super clone movement, 3K is the only option. However, just several weeks ago, the exclusive licensing agreement between 3K factory and the movement manufacturer has expired, now many factories can get the super clone PP324 movement if they have enough money, BBF is not the first one, but the Aquanaut 5168 from them is really good, I made a simple comparison between it and the one from 3K.

The left watch is from 3K, the right one is from BBF. Which one do you like? The left one looks too green. The green color on the right watch is closer to genuine watch.
Since its release, 3K factory has never made color upgrade on this replica watch, this is not acceptable, many buyers paid a lot of money to seek dial and rubber band in correct color to change on, now you do not need to waste money to do this now, the Aquanaut from BBF has correct color on the dial and the rubber band.

The date font on BBF Aquanaut is thicker. It is said that the Aquanaut from BBF uses the date wheel made by SW.


The movement in the BBF Aquanaut is a clone PP324, whose engravings on the plates are deeper. The engravings on the PP330 of the 3KF Aquanaut are a bit too shallow.
The weight of the 3KF Aquanaut is about 98.5 grams, while the weight of the BBF Aquanaut is about 100.6 grams.

The dial lume light has no big difference, but it seems like the lume light on the 3K is stronger.
My conclusion:
BBF makes improvements on the dial, rubber band and movement engravings, it is more cost-efficient to buy this watch from BBF.